The State of Georgia vs. Evolutionary Biology :: Exploratory Essays Research Papers

The State of Georgia vs. Evolutionary BiologyDouglas J. Futuyma, in Evolutionary Biology defined evolution as, ...change in the properties of populations of organisms that transcend the life history of a single individual. The ontogeny of an individual is not considered evolution individual organisms do not evolve. The changes in populations that are considered evolutionary are those that are ancestral via the genetic material from one generation to the next. (1) Like most of the population, Ive never picked up a copy of Evolutionary Biology and have only of late thought about the most correct definition of the term. The issue at hand is that most people do not reference scientific texts when formulating an whim about evolution. Websters Dictionary defines evolution as ...the development of a species, organism, or organ from its original or primitive state to its present or narrow state phylogeny or ontogeny. Evolution, as I have concluded, is a scientific term, which has taken on a more contr everywheresial and politicized importation in the non-scientific community, due in part to misinterpretation and false or misleading definitions like those presented in common prevalentations like Websters Dictionary. In our society, is it possible to keep down the politicized issues surrounding evolution by giving the concept a refreshful name?In January of 2004, Georgia State Schools Superintendent Kathy Cox proposed a new biology curriculum for students which would remove the term evolution from the classroom and replace it with biological changes everywhere time. According to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution and other regional publications, critics are look that this change in terminology will weaken students learning experience. The adjusted biology curriculum would not require a revised textbook, nor would individual public school systems be prevented from teaching evolution in depth if they chose to do so. (2) Yet, even with this flexibility and minimal change to actual curriculum Georgia residents and politicians across the nation are in an uproar. An Atlanta Journal-Constitution online survey found that 12,900 people preferred the term evolution as opposed to the 1,783 who were in favor of biological changes over time. Evolution, according to the most scientifically accepted theories is biological change over time. In What Evolution Is, Ernst Mayr presents the same simplified definition, describing evolution as ...change in the properties of populations of organisms over time. (4) If Kathy Cox feels that the theory might be better accepted if it is known as biological changes over time, that is her decision as State Schools Superintendent.